California Geothermal Heat Pump ROI Evaluation Study

The goal of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of geothermal heat pumps when compared to traditional forms of energy (i.e. electricity and natural gas) used in California.  Individual tests are currently being conducted for each of the 16 climate zones within California to determine the specific requirements.  To help find the specific parameters for each system, weather data from the last few years is being used to synthesize a heating and cooling load profile for each of the climate zones.  Along with the weather profiles, the geologic data (i.e. thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity) for each of the climate zones is being incorporated into the model to refine the testing parameters.  Each profile will be run through a geothermal heat pump design program (GLDesign) to determine the depth of the borehole needed to accommodate the heating/cooling load for each climate zone.  The product of this study will be an install cost and payback period report as well as (funds permitting) an interactive map for home and business owners to calcuate rough ROIs for geothermal heat pump systems in their respective areas.

This study is being funded by the California Energy Commission through the Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) program.  Completion of this study is expected in April of 2012. Reports and findings will be posted as they become available.

Associated Study Maps:

California Geologic Map with Climate Overlay

California Climate Map

California Geologic Map

Map Legend for California Geologic Map

 

The CGEC is currently studying the potential use of geothermal heat pumps, their effectiveness and payback period (ROI) in 30 U.S. metropolitan areas. To identify the total cost of a geothermal heat pump and the system's associated payback period, ground heat, weather, and house characteristics data have been gathered and are being modeled against an average house's consumption in each metropolitan area. Energy loads are currently being simulated using a ground heat exchanger modeling software to determine appropriate borehole depths and borehole fields. The product of this study will be an install cost and payback period report as well as (funds permitting) an interactive map for home and business owners to calcuate rough ROIs for their respective areas.

Metropolitan Areas:

1. New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA
2. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA
3. Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI
4. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
5. Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
6. Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX
7. Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL
8. Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA
9. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
10. Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH
11. Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI
12. Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ
13. San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
14. Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
15. Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
16. Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
17. San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA
18. St. Louis, MO-IL
19. Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
20. Baltimore-Towson, MD
21. Denver-Aurora, CO
22. Pittsburgh, PA
23. Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA
24. Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN
25. Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA
26. Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH
27. Orlando-Kissimmee, FL
28. San Antonio, TX
29. Kansas City, MO-KS
30. Las Vegas-Paradise, NV

Supporting Source Data

Thermal Conductivity Data Set (Excel)

This research is funded by Bob Lawrence and Associates coupled with a grant from the Department of Energy. More information about this study can be found on the GHPsRUS website by clicking here. The expected completion date for this project is December 31, 2012.

Thermal Conductivity Data Set (Excel)

USGS Groundwater Well Data (Excel)

Argonne Geochemical Database (Excel)